Obama's impossible Muslim standard

Wed, 08/06/2008 - 7:55pm
Bill Pugliano/Getty Images

Steve Clemons gives the Barack Obama campaign a good thrashing from the left today for the candidate's willingness to accept the resignation of his Muslim outreach coordinator, Mazen Asbahi. The Wall Street Journal reports that Asbahi, a Chicago lawyer, resigned because of questions about his ties to an Illinois-based Imam named Jamal Said who has been accused (though not indicted) of fundraising for Hamas. The two served together for a few weeks on the board of an Islamic investment fund back in 2000. Predictable smug outrage has followed on right-wing blogs.

According to the Journal, the tenuous connection between Asbahi and Said was first noted by the Global Muslim Brotherhood Daily Report, a subscription-only Web site that tracks the international activity of that Islamic party and its supporters. The WSJ says the Report is published by a "Washington think tank," but there doesn't seem to be any author or organizational affiliation mentioned on the site, and a Whois lookup yields no clues.

The Report employs a fairly loose definition of Muslim Brotherhood affiliates that includes fairly mainstream organizations such as the Islamic Society of North America and the Council on American-Islamic Relations. Amusingly, recent FP contributors Graham Fuller and Marc Lynch are also described as Muslim Brotherhood sympathizers. As Passport readers know, Lynch has indeed met with senior Brotherhood leaders in Cairo, but they hardly see eye to eye. Fuller's supposed ties are of the six-degrees-of-Mahdi Akef variety.

By the standards of this site, you are not only a fellow traveler of the Muslim Brotherhood if you have defended them or recommended dialogue with them, you need only have been loosely associated with people who held those views. By this standard, there probably isn't one prominent Muslim-American in the country that Obama could hire for the campaign. Anyone he could find who has never participated in an event that includes people with sympathies Obama might not agree with is probably not actually influential enough to win him any votes.

Even in a campaign full of trumped-up outrage and guilt by association, the Asbahi affair is pretty absurd. This is roughly the equivalent of Obama throwing Chris Rock under the bus because he once appeared in a movie with the anti-semitic Mel Gibson. If nothing else, it's an indication of how rattled the Obama campaign is by all the Muslim rumors.

Update: ABC's Jake Tapper has much more:

As long as we're playing the guilt by association game, we should note that Karen Hughes, back when she worked for the State Department, spoke before an ISNA conference and was honored with an ISNA dinner, and both former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice have met with ISNA leadership.

Also check out the comments on this post for some more investigation into the mysterious Global Muslim Brotherhood Daily Report website.

( filed under: )


Advertisement

 

AASU Cyber Security Research Institute?

Weird... globalmbreport.com points to a server (or router/firewall) with the IP 75.145.15.49. That address is assigned to "AASU-CSRI", which would seem to be the AASU Cyber Security Research Institute. Since a lot of the information in the newsletter (which I have not yet seen...) probably comes from bulletin boards and the like, it sort of makes sense that a "cyber security" researcher would be responsible. It's just kind of weird how shady they are about (assuming I am correct) their responsibility for it.

Not AASU?

None of the staff on this website pull up any hits on "Muslim Brotherhood" or Islam in general when ran through Google. The site below for the AASU Cyber Security Research Institute is in a totally different IP range (130.254.32.10) to the one registered to AASU-CSRI http://cybersecurity.armstrong.edu/ A deep black hole of mystery. Certainly NOT a 'Washington think-tank'...

The right decision

The fact is that most leaders of traditional Muslim organizations are affiliated with or draw inspiration from the Muslim Brotherhood and its founder Hassan al-Banna as well as Syed Qutb. Both gentlemen preached armed Jihad against the West and their literature is still available and distributed in US and Canada. ISNA, CAIR and MSA have never ever denounced nor distanced themselves from the doctrine of armed Jihad as pronounced by Syed Qutb and Hassan al-Banna. You say, "By this standard, there probably isn't one prominent Muslim-American in the country that Obama could hire for the campaign." This is simply not true. Most Muslims in the US and Canada are not affiliated with any Mosque or any of the above organizations. If Obama is looking for Muslim outreach, he needs to look among his own friends; Muslims who he trusts and who can see through the web of deception these Islamists are hiding behind. http://www.Chasingamirage.com

Not the issue

Tarek, The actual ideology of these organizations isn't really that important in this case. Asbahi is not being accused of holding radical views or of being a member of any radical organizations. His crime is having at various point come into contact with people and organizations that an anonymous blogger deems to be part of the Muslim Brotherhood's kudzu-like web of international influence. I maintain that whatever you think of CAIR, ISNA and MSA--any prominent Muslim-American who couldn't at least speak to these organizations' members and sympathizers wouldn't be a very good outreach coordinator.

My favourite form of hypocrisy: the American kind

So Hamas is bad, right? What about the House of Saud? What about the Kabul government? The Baghdad government? What about Osama bin Laden? Muslim groups are friends or enemies based on their immediately geopolitical usefulness to the United States of America. Just watch "Rambo III" and note who Rambo is friends with. It has nothing to do with morality, ethics, or terrorism. Hamas doesn't like Israel (hmm, I wonder why) so they're bad. Kabul made a pipeline, so they're good. And so on. At this point, every politician in America should be "thrown under the bus" based on their associations, past and present, with unethical Muslim groups.

A good lesson for Muslim Youths of America

This fallout should be a case-in-point for American Muslims Youth to draw lessons from. To be able to achieve their potential in the American society, Muslims Youth of America need to and have to distant themselves from America's Islamic establishment and their web cobs.

Amazing how people who

Amazing how people who accuse others of twisting the truth can do so themselves: "Amusingly, recent FP contributors Graham Fuller and Marc Lynch are also described as Muslim Brotherhood sympathizers. As Passport readers know, Lynch has indeed met with senior Brotherhood leaders in Cairo, but they hardly see eye to eye. Fuller's supposed ties are of the six-degrees-of-Mahdi Akef variety" I registered for the Global Muslim Brotherhood report to check out what they actually write and I searched for the Marc Lynch articles. Nowhere is he described as a "Muslim Brotherhood sympathizer." They did write that he was "generally sympathetic" toward the Brotherhood which does seem to be true based on his comments on them. Fuller is only written abut once in connection with the Conflicts Forum, a group which also seems to be very favorable towards Hamas and Hezbollah but Fuller is also not described as a "Muslim Brotherhood sympathizer." "By the standards of this site, you are not only a fellow traveler of the Muslim Brotherhood if you have defended them or recommended dialogue with them, you need only have been loosely associated with people who held those views" Doesn't seem that way to me. As far as I can tell, they are very careful to document close relationships to the Muslim Brotherhood. I don't see any evidence that people defending the Brotherhood are called "fellow travelers" or by an other name. "check out the comments on this post for some more investigation into the mysterious Global Muslim Brotherhood Daily Report website." Maybe the cyber research people only registered the site? Haven't you people ever noticed that the registrant is not always the site operator?

Accurate take

Everybody should calm down and read this: http://counterterrorismblog.org/2008/08/a_look_at_the_resignation_of_m.php This "I was only on the board for two weeks" and "six-degrees of separation" is a bunch of nonsense. There is alot more to this story.