Passport : Tom Ricks : Dan Drezner : Stephen Walt : David Rothkopf : Marc Lynch
The Cable : Madam Secretary : Shadow Govt. : The Argument : The Call
U.S. newspapers distribute 'terror' DVDs to subscribers
Editor and Publisher reports that, over the weekend, millions of DVDs of a film, Obsession: Radical Islam's War Against the West, were delivered by newspapers mainly in key swing states such as Florida and Pennsylvania. The New York Times, the Miami Herald, Denver Post, and the Columbus Dispatch were among 70 papers, by E&P's count, that were paid to distribute the film.
The unusual advertising supplement is being bankrolled by the Clarion Fund, a non-profit, "non-partisan" group whose "primary focus is on the most urgent threat of radical Islam." The movie itself, which originally aired on the Fox network, was funded by an undisclosed donor.
"The threat of Radical Islam is the most important issue facing us today,'' the hour-long film's jacket reads. ''But it's a topic that neither the presidential candidates nor the media are discussing openly. It's our responsibility to ensure we can all make an informed vote in November.''
Here's a short clip:
If the tone of E&P's coverage is any indication, I guess I'm supposed to be upset by this. Sure, the film looks to be an unsophisticated, unnuanced look at the phenomenon of radical Islam and terrorism. It's propaganda, not journalism. The group's logo is distasteful, and the Web site explains "Islam itself" as "a kind of fascism that achieves its full and proper form only when it assumes the powers of the state." I'm aware that the DVD is obviously intended to help out John McCain. But so what? Advocacy groups on both sides do similar things all the time, and it's nothing the same crowd hasn't been saying for years. What's really new here?
- Decision '08 | Islam | Media | Terrorism












Not much different than CFR fav's
Max Boot and Thomas Friedman convet the same message whenever they are advocating/justifying our wars int eh Mid East. So it isn't surprising that you'd be non-plussed by this.
CFR: "Yes, we support putting out pro-war, pro-big Military Industrial complex propaganda, so what, we are bi-partisian"
Nothing new here
The CFR is supporting the war on terror...the war on American's freedoms. Whether the democrats or republicans use propaganda to help us do this we are not concerned. We only want to make sure that nobody questions the legitimacy of the Fed, the War on Terror, the war on drugs, the war on poverty, the war on carbon dioxide producers(those dirty humans).
As long as power is centralized we care not what means are used.---Blake Hounshell CFR propaganda agent
Get your conspiracy theories straight, Gabe
Foreign Policy is not affiliated with the Council on Foreign Relations in any way.
My error
Your advertisements and cross links with CFR got me confused about where I was. In any case the Carnegie funded institutions have been pushing for the same things as the Rockefeller funded institutions for the last 60 years so the issues are the same.
You serve as a mouthpiece for those wishing to spread "climate change" and "war on terror" propaganda. Your published by "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace", yet you smear peaceful non-interventionist philosophies with shrill "isolationist" monikers.
You defend the government for lying about 9/11.
case in point
I don't hear any moral defense for Frredman's mindless "suck on this" warmongering shown here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HOF6ZeUvgXs
instead your organization still proudly displays the propaganda of this first class jerk who helped lie America into war.