Passport : Tom Ricks : Dan Drezner : Stephen Walt : David Rothkopf : Marc Lynch
The Cable : Madam Secretary : Shadow Govt. : The Argument : The Call
Summary of HR 7801 – approving the U.S.-India peaceful nuclear cooperation agreement
HR 7801 – approving the U.S.-India peaceful
nuclear cooperation agreement
<!--[if !supportLists]-->·
<!--[endif]-->H.R.
7801 was approved by the House of Representatives on September 27 by a vote of
298-117, with one member voting present.
The Senate Committee on Foreign Relations approved identical legislation
(S. 3548) on September 23 by a vote of 19-2.
<!--[if !supportLists]-->·
<!--[endif]-->The
bill gives final approval to the agreement with India on peaceful nuclear
cooperation. In the “Hyde Act” (P.L.
109-401), Congress set certain terms and conditions for the agreement, in order
to permit the President to submit the agreement under the Atomic Energy Act of
1954.
<!--[if !supportLists]-->·
<!--[endif]-->The
Senate approved the Hyde Act by a vote of 85-12 on November 16, 2006 (the
conference report was approved by voice vote on December 9, 2006). Under the Hyde Act and the Atomic Energy Act,
the agreement cannot enter into force unless Congress approves the agreement.
<!--[if !supportLists]-->·
<!--[endif]-->The
Hyde Act required the President to make several determinations to Congress in
submitting the agreement. These included
–
<!--[if !supportLists]-->o
<!--[endif]-->that
India has provided the United States and the International Atomic Energy Agency
(IAEA) a credible plan to separate its civil and military nuclear facilities;
<!--[if !supportLists]-->o
<!--[endif]-->that
India and the IAEA have concluded all legal steps required prior to signature
of an IAEA safeguards agreement;
<!--[if !supportLists]-->o
<!--[endif]-->that
India and the IAEA are making substantial progress toward concluding an
Additional Protocol to the safeguards agreement, based on the Model Additional
Protocol; and
<!--[if !supportLists]-->o
<!--[endif]-->that
the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG), an informal organization consisting of 44
countries, has decided by consensus to permit supply to India of nuclear items
covered by the NSG guidelines.
<!--[if !supportLists]-->·
<!--[endif]-->The
President made the required determinations on September 10, 2008, a few days
after the NSG, meeting in Vienna, gave approval to nuclear commerce with India.
<!--[if !supportLists]-->·
<!--[endif]-->H.R.
7081 was developed on a bipartisan basis by the House Committee on Foreign
Affairs and the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, and in consultation with
the Department of State. The Bush
Administration supports H.R. 7081.
<!--[if !supportLists]-->·
<!--[endif]-->The
bill waives the 30-day consultation requirement in the Atomic Energy Act of
1954, because this 30 day clock is not expected to elapse until mid-October.
<!--[if !supportLists]-->·
<!--[endif]-->The
bill also improves congressional oversight, and sets forth markers regarding
implementation of the agreement and U.S. non-proliferation policy,
specifically:
<!--[if !supportLists]-->1.
<!--[endif]-->It
makes clear that all aspects of the Atomic Energy Act and the Hyde Act other
than those relating to how the agreement is approved will continue to apply to
the U.S.-India agreement.
<!--[if !supportLists]-->2.
<!--[endif]-->It
reaffirms that approval of the agreement is based on U.S. interpretations of
its terms. This relates to several
issues, including the U.S. view that fuel assurances provided by President Bush
are a political, rather than legally binding, commitment.
<!--[if !supportLists]-->3.
<!--[endif]-->It
requires the President to certify that approving the agreement is consistent
with the U.S. obligation under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty not to
assist or encourage India to produce nuclear weapons.
<!--[if !supportLists]-->4.
<!--[endif]-->Before
any licenses can be issued by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission under the
agreement, the bill requires that India’s safeguards agreement with the IAEA
enter into force, and that India file a declaration of civilian nuclear
facilities under the safeguards agreement that is not “materially inconsistent”
with the separation plan that India issued in 2006.
<!--[if !supportLists]-->5.
<!--[endif]-->The
bill requires prompt notification to Congress if India diverges from its
separation plan in implementing its safeguards agreement.
<!--[if !supportLists]-->6.
<!--[endif]-->The
bill establishes a procedure for congressional review of any subsequent
arrangement under the agreement that would allow India to reprocess spent
nuclear fuel that was derived from U.S.-supplied reactor fuel or produced with
U.S.-supplied equipment. Under current
law (Section 131 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954), such arrangements take
effect 15 days after notice thereof is published in the Federal Register.
<!--[if !supportLists]-->7.
<!--[endif]-->The
bill enhances general oversight of nuclear cooperation agreements by requiring
that the President keep the Foreign Relations Committee “fully and currently informed”
of any initiative or negotiations on new or amended civilian nuclear
cooperation agreements.
<!--[if !supportLists]-->8.
<!--[endif]-->The
bill requires the President to certify that it is U.S. policy to work in the
Nuclear Suppliers Group to achieve further restrictions on transfers of enrichment
and reprocessing equipment or technology.
<!--[if !supportLists]-->9.
<!--[endif]-->The
bill also directs the President to seek international agreement on procedures
to guard against the diversion of heavy water from civilian to military
programs, and requires the President to keep Congress regularly apprised of how
that effort is proceeding.












Recent comments
11 hours 42 min ago
11 hours 49 min ago
12 hours 31 min ago
15 hours 38 min ago
16 hours 57 min ago
16 hours 59 min ago
21 hours 5 min ago
1 day 4 hours ago
1 day 9 hours ago
1 day 9 hours ago