Palin: Go Galt!

Wed, 09/23/2009 - 11:47am

Earlier today, former Alaska governor and Republican vice-presidential hopeful Sarah Palin gave a speech to a group of investors in Hong Kong, for which the brokerage firm CLSA allegedly paid her $300,000.

Former McCain foreign-policy adviser Randy Scheunemann and a bevy of other veteran Republican aides reportedly prepped Palin for the speech, which Politico and other outlets have suggested implies she's prepping herself for 2012.

No reporters were allowed into the private event, but some investors passed good information on to Bloomberg News (which dryly notes that Palin first got a U.S. passport in 2007). The Wall Street Journal also seems to have some inside sources. Washington Wire offers a number of lengthy quotes.

Let's take a look.

The foreign-policy sections were something of a snooze -- some gentle urging for China to become more responsible on human rights, some criticism of its treatment of ethnic minorities and aiming of arms at Taiwan, some commentary on the trade and currency imbalances, some criticism of the United States for utilizing China as a "lender of first resort."

Regarding economics and the recession, though, Palin got a lot more interesting.

Foremost, she pinned the blame for the financial crisis on the U.S. Federal Reserve. Not the interplay of investment-bank profits, trade imbalances, the rise of securitization, the creation of zero-deposit loans, oil prices, the housing bubble, the credit rating agencies, and other commonly cited factors. Just the Fed.

"How can we discuss reform without addressing the government policies at the root of the problems? The root of the collapse? And how can we think that setting up the Fed as the monitor of systemic risk in the financial sector will result in meaningful reform?," she said. "The words 'fox' and 'henhouse' come to mind. The Fed's decisions helped create the bubble. Look at the root cause of most asset bubbles, and you'll see the Fed somewhere in the background."

She added, "The government forced lending institutions to give loans to people who, as I say, couldn't afford them." (Emphasis mine. These assertions reportedly caused two observers to walk out, saying "It's awful." Notably, the Chinese government actually does force banks to lend.)

Finally: "[Alaskans] have much in common with Hong Kong. We're both young and transient, independent and libertarian. Places that continue to show the world, the power and the resilience of the free-market system at a time when too many are questioning it." (Emphasis mine.)

It seems Palin -- whose prior public pronouncements have been somewhat ideologically incoherent -- has finally picked her strand of conservatism: libertarianism. It's a choice that makes sense. If the economy recovers well by 2012, conservatives of all stripes will have, well, several trillion reasons to talk about government spending and U.S. deficits.

But, I really think if Palin wants to establish her economic conservative credentials she should head back to the statehouse and encourage the state to go Galt -- turning Alaska into the United States' Hong Kong, a relatively tax-free, regulation-free, federal government-free zone. It would be rough. Alaska receives more federal subsidies per capita than any other state. But managing the Last Frontier without this Washington cash would demonstrate her executive prowess -- and would show that no entity should need interventionist government life-support to thrive.

But, sigh, I guess she'll probably just continue to brush-up on foreign policy and beef up her conservative credentials in more conventional ways.

Photo of Palin's resignation speech by Eric Engman/Getty Images

( filed under: )


Advertisement

 

Palin actually right for once?

Tracing the subprime crisis back to the Fed and the deplorable practices under the auspices of Alan Greenspan is not really that far-fetched. Her economic advisers were correct in asserting that behind almost every asset-bubble in the last century the Federal Reserve has been the main cause. Greenspan decided that the best way to bring the country out of the dot com was to keep interest rates at rock-bottom for 2.5 years. It is an axiom of finance that low-interest rates encourage bankers to seek out higher-return (riskier) investments. The demand for mortgage-backed securities is just another example of this demand for high return investments.

Listen, obviously bankers are to blame, but they will always be if the rules of the game and the economic environment the Fed creates allows for reckless behavior. If you put a bunch of teenage drivers in corvettes and make the town speed limit 100MPH there is bound to be a pile-up. The same applies to the economic climate in the run-up to subprime.

AND look at what's happening now! The bankers have found a new high-yield, high risk investment they can use to offer high returns to investors while the Fed keeps interests rates at near zero. It's called life settlements - and you might want to read up on them as they will probably be the trigger for the next recession. (http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/06/business/06insurance.html?scp=2&sq=life%20insurance&st=cse)

The Fed II

Credit where credit is due (pardon the pun).

Ron Paul testified in 2003 about the danger of the Fed underwriting Fannie and Freddie: ". . .Ironically, by transferring the risk of a widespread mortgage default, the government increases the likelihood of a painful crash in the housing market. This is because the special privileges granted to Fannie and Freddie have distorted the housing market by allowing them to attract capital they could not attract under pure market conditions."
http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul128.html

It happened. There has been a "painful crash" because lenders knew that Uncle Sugar would make good on bad loans.

Paul wants to abolish the Fed. His bill to audit the Federal Reserve (HR 1207) now has 290 co-sponsors, and the numbers keep growing! HR 1207’s companion bill in the Senate, S 604, has already attracted 27 co-sponsors.

All for show, not for go

"Randy Scheunemann" and "libertarian" don't belong in the same sentence unless the sentence is, "Fire-breathing neocon Randy Scheunemann embodies the antithesis of libertarian philosophy."

A little Fed bashing in front of an audience of Asian financiers? That's just playing to the crowd over there, while trying to glom onto nascent anti-Fed sentiment at home a couple days before the aforementioned audit-the-Fed bill finally gets a hearing.

Palin made her bed last year with neocons, especially Kid Kristol. It'll be mighty hard for her to climb out of that bed and keep her remaining credibility intact.

Randy Scheunemann

.....has yet to account for his role in Saakashvili's folly.

Until then.....