It is incorrect to claim that the USA "offered" to supply bunker-busters to Israel.

The Israeli press are reporting this very differently i.e. that Netanyahu requested those bunker busters, and Obama said in reply: Go talk to Panetta.

And as for the second report: Heavy vehicles at a miitary research facility!

Gosh! That's unique, isn't it?

Obviously the Iranians have something to hide because - let's face it - who needs heavy vehicles at a military research facility?

when the shit hits the fan, people should be blaming the likes of you and your stupid enablers for popularizing iran and fetishizing their feigned innocence ...

moron is the PERFECT word for you.

How about, just for one moment, considering the facts? Or do they matter at all in the drumbeat for a most disastrous new war?

Iran with no nuclear weapons is zero military threat against nuclear superpower Israel.

Israel (which refuses to sign or abide by the NPT) is in possession of many hundreds of nuclear warheads. More importantly, it possesses the most advanced delivery systems in the world including nuclear powered ballistic missile firing submarines. A nation with zero nuclear weapons does not attack another with hundreds. Even if (a hypothetical) Iran did some day acquire a nuclear weapon (to secure itself from vicarious nuclear attack) it could never use it against Israel because of the intertwined nature of the Palestinian and Israeli populations. Al-Aqsa Mosque, the third holiest site in world Islam is in Jerusalem and they would never risk its destruction.

But lets just ignore all of that. I ask all the Zionist posters howling for war, to seriously consider the CONSEQUENCES of an Israeli attack.

If you are paying attention, Syria is currently and steadily sliding into chaos. What originally was a movement in support of democracy is now steadily moving into a sectarian conflict between the Shiia and the Sunni. The Saudis are going to finance weapons for the insurgency. The Shiia of Lebanon and Iran are fearful of major political loss in this, and reluctantly but to date resolutely, continue to back Al-Assad. A war against Iran initiated by Israel would spread to our interests in about half an hour. Iran would certainly hit back to the best their abilities. Prices for petroleum would certainly skyrocket to who knows what level, collapsing our fragile economy like a house of cards. Same for the whole world's economy for the same reasons. Mass chaos from Lebanon to Pakistan. Things quickly spiral out of control. Afghanistan explodes. Al-Qaeda claps its hands in glee in Yemen and Somalia. China and Russia get quite hostile. Radioactive clouds drift eastward over India. And of course in this event, Iran would conclude that it must quickly obtain a nuclear WMD capability. Achieving exactly what you claim you want to avoid!

Great! An Israeli attack slams the whole world into what? A bridge too far? Total global chaos?

Choose your own apocalyptic metaphors. Israel's current political support in the US could evaporate literally overnight.

HAHAHAHAH...

Wait till that comes out tmorrow or something...hahahah...meir dagan is many things, but above all, he was head spymaster for israel for near a decade...you think he's going to air his true thoughts on iran so publicly on television? As many israelis know, these days, dagan is aiming for a career in politics, and he may be thinking if he endears himself to obama, he will get support to try to topple bibi...they can certainly try...it wont work, but they can go for it...

the other possibility is that dagan is saying one thing to tamp down expectations of a strike and then.....bammo!

either way, I would not believe one word from dagan's mouth on so sensitive a subject and certainly not in so public of a way...

can't wait for FP to be allllll over it though...salivating...with all waltz' little "I'm really pro israel cause I care so much" crowd...LOL....

Ambassador of Death: Attack of the Drones.

In our world and our time, Drones (Unmanned Aerial Vehicles), which were experimentally manufactured in 1916, were first armed in order to attempt to kill Osama bin Laden.

They were and still are proven to be unreliable due to the fact that their target abilities are far from surgical precision, they are unstable when flying in less than perfect weather and they crash very often. In addition, loss of communication with these drones is one of the many technical issues that lead to their sub par performance. After consideration, President Clinton decided to shut down the project.

Later on, Bush reopened the project, refinanced it and made used of these drones 44 times, despite the acknowledgement of the performance reports. The attacks evidently lead to casualties; bodies were often hidden and buried by troops on the ground.

However, for now, most drones aren’t exploited for military purpose. They are mostly used for surveillance, reconnaissance, news reporting, border patrolling, intelligence and inspection.

As such, most industrialized countries such as China, France, United Kingdom, Germany, Russia, India, Canada, Australia, Pakistan, Japan and Brazil do “harvest” drones. Some of the super drones have even been baptized. Israel named theirs Heron; the United States upgraded their Predator with the Avenger; and, last but not least, Iran named theirs Karrar, which is Farsi for Striker. President Ahmadinejad infamously nicknamed his Persian Menace: the Ambassador of Death.

Episode X : The Persian Menace.

Do not let the Ambassador of Death mislead you into being alarmed. The Ambassador of Death is not Darth Vader’s vehicle of choice. This drone is intended for, and I quote: “Peace and Friendship“. Logically, why should we be nervous over Iran since they have not initiated any attack towards any other country in over 200 years? And yes, the Persian Gulf War has been taken in consideration when making that statement.

That being said, it evidently is not the case when shifting our attention towards the previously mentioned pro-drone countries. Over 239 drone strikes were ordered under the Obama administration. Many of these attacks were carried out against the advice of U.S. Officials and Diplomats. In fact, that tendency has led the Obama Administration of being responsible for at least 85% of drone strikes around the world, particularly in Pakistan.

This is the same Obama that won the Nobel Peace Prize in 2009. Even then, his addition seems unsuited and undeserved, when one remembers past laureates.

As mentioned in a previous article of mine, the five countries (United Kingdom, United States, France, Russia and China) that have secured permanent United Nation seats are also the top global arm dealers. These same countries have been accusing Iran of secretly building nuclear weapons and pressuring them to halt their nuclear program.

It is important to understand or remember that the U.S. did not only assist but also coordinated the launch of the Iranian Nuclear Program in the 50s. This program was maintained for decades, until the 1979 revolution.

This support was even symbolized and categorized as the “Atoms for Peace” Program, implemented in 1953 by Eisenhower. Let’s acknowledge that a program would not be complete without an appropriate inaugural speech. And where else but at the United Nation General Assembly can a prestigious one take place? In this case, the cleverly named “Atoms for Peace” speech quickly followed Eisenhower’s “Chance for Peace” speech.

All this backing did result in the inception of Iran’s first nuclear power plant, which was completed and activated thanks to Russian assistance, in 2011.

The irony! The Atoms for Peace Program’s main principle was to reassure the world during the Cold War (between 1945 and 1991). Sarcastically, the Russians presided over its closing ceremony.

As a counter attack, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) board, nations and multinational entities officially reprimanded and sanctioned Iran. This judgment was internationally supported by detailed tangible and evidence. The Iranian authorities, or should I say THE Iranian Authority, Ayatollah Seyed Ali Hosseini khamenei, has not yet been successfully coerced by the international pressure. The U.N. inspectors can come and go as often as necessary, it’s all in good faith, from both parties.

Remember, it’s a ll about Peace and Friendship.

“Look up in the sky, it’s a bird, it’s a plane… No, it’s a drone!”

The Empire Will Strike Back. It is just a question on which Empire will strike first.

Guess who’s building nuclear power plants now?

READ MORE AT : THUSALWAYSTOGENIUS

UMMMM, Obama will still be the one to handle Foreign affairs.....not Biden. Biden can only offer up suggestions, and n the end it is up to Obama to take it, in which he will not, because he will handle it just the way he wants to, and you can believe that those Muslims who are currently working on the Obama campaign....you know, Obama's close friends from College.....Do you really want to see these people in the white house. If you do, then you are a traitor to the US..

"Is rio orange war always comparateur forfait bloque inevitable ?"
MaximB

He did a half assed job of it. Osama was on our side fighting the Soviets in Afghanistan. The Reagan administration really stepped up support for the Mujhahidine and kicked some Russian butt. Now since old Osama turned on us like a rabid dog, he has to be put down like a rabid dog..

"Is rio orange war always forfait mobile blackberry inevitable ?"
MaximB

for much better reasons than in placing the NUCLEAR FOOTBALL in the wobbly hands of a Socialist/Marxist quasi-Muslim sleeper agent...for instance....

"Is rio orange war always forfait internet inevitable ?"
MaximB