Uprising of Women in the Arab World is not pleased with Facebook.
The group, which advocates for women's rights in the Middle
East, issued a press
statement on Nov. 7 claiming that Facebook, once hailed as the catalyst of
the Arab Spring, was purposefully targeting the organization through
censorship. After a member posted a controversial photograph to the group's
Facebook page on Oct. 25, group leaders say, the social networking giant
reacted by blocking the image and suspending the account of the administrator
who posted it for 24 hours.
"The photograph was part of a campaign which asks the
members of our Facebook page to post pictures of themselves holding banners
that explain why they support The Uprising of Women in the Arab World," Diala
Haider, one of the organization's administrators, explained in an interview.
"Women from all the Arab countries participated and expressed their demands and
outrage at social discrimination and the ways in which women have been
marginalized in the public sphere."
This particular photograph was posted by Dana Bakdounes, a
young woman from Syria. In it, Bakdounes is pictured with her hair uncovered,
holding her passport, which has a photo of her wearing a hijab. She also holds a sign which reads: "I am with the uprising
of women in the Arab world because for 20 years I was not allowed to feel the
wind in my hair and on my body."
Haider says that after the first time Bakdounes' photo was removed
by Facebook, supporters of The Uprising of Women in the Arab World responded by
posting the image to their own Facebook pages and on Twitter. Convinced that
the removal of the photograph had
been an error on the part of Facebook, one of the administrators, Yalda Younes,
reposted the image to the original page. Facebook then allegedly removed the
photograph again and suspended her account for seven days. The group filled out
a feedback request stating that Facebook's actions were a violation of free
speech, and on Oct. 31 the block on Bakdounes' photo was removed. But just a
week later, after the organization posted a status update on Facebook asking
its supporters to follow the group on Twitter and use the hashtag #DanaWind for
solidarity, Haider says Facebook suspended all five of the administrators'
accounts and sent them an official notice warning that their accounts could be
deleted if they violated Facebook community rules again.
"We've had a lot of religious fanatics and extremists who
use offensive and insulting language in reaction to our efforts," says Haider.
"They call us infidels for supporting the freedom of women to choose things
like whether to wear a veil or not. We've come under attack, but that was
expected.... The real surprise was Facebook's reaction to the page."
In a statement posted on Reddit on Nov. 13 and confirmed to Foreign Policy as official by a Facebook
spokesman, Facebook explained that the incident was simply an error:
"We made a mistake," the statement reads. "In this case, we
mistakenly blocked images from The Uprising of Women in the Arab World Page,
and worked to rectify the mistake as soon as we were notified.... To be clear,
the images of the woman were not in violation of our terms. Instead, a mistake
was made in the process of responding to a report on controversial content.... What
made this situation worse is that we made multiple mistakes over a number of
days, and it took time to rectify each of these missteps."
Incidents such as the removal of Bakdounes' photo raise
questions about Facebook's content moderation system, which has come under fire
in recent months. In February, Amine Derkaoui, a Moroccan employee of oDesk, one
of the outsourcing firms that Facebook used to moderate its content at the time, leaked
internal documents to Gawker detailing the social media site's content
guidelines. According to the documents, while "camel toes" and breastfeeding
mothers are off limits, "Crushed heads, limbs etc are OK as long as no
insides are showing." Facebook terminated its partnership with oDesk in May.
similar to the removal of Bakdounes' photo occurred in April 2011 when a
photograph of gay men kissing was removed (and subsequently reposted by
Facebook with an apology for its "error"). The site has also been criticized
the New Yorker's Facebook page after
the magazine posted a cartoon that depicted female nipples. In October, a group
of Navy SEALS claimed that Facebook was censoring
an anti-Obama meme when it took down the image and provided no explanation for
its removal until after the story was reported -- at which point Facebook
to news outlets apologizing for its mistake.
These episodes begin to make more sense when you factor in
the system that, at least until May, Facebook used to moderate its content. Derkaoui
told Gawker that he was part of a team of 50 people from across the globe -- many
from poor countries -- who moderated Facebook's content from home for as little
as $1 an hour. He did not return requests for comment, and Facebook has been
tightlipped about which companies it now uses to moderate content, failing to
respond to emailed questions sent by Foreign
Vaughn Hester, who works at Crowdflower, a San
Francisco-based crowdsourcing firm that also tasks employees from around the
world with moderating content, told
The Daily Beast in September that "asking moderators to flag photos that are
‘offensive' can result in very different attitudes in terms of what constitutes
offensive content versus permissible content." Given what seems to be the inherent
subjectivity of the content moderation industry, as well as the vast cultural and religious differences between
employees from different countries, it seems possible that a photograph like
Bakdounes', which Americans might not find offensive in the least, could have
upset a moderator from another country.
Panagiotis Ipeirotis, an associate professor in the
Operations and Management Sciences department at New York University's Stern
School of Business, says that there are many ways to identify and eliminate
biases in the content moderation industry.
"You might, for example, compare different moderators' work
against each other," says Ipeirotis. "So, if you're worried about cultural
biases, you can take five moderators from different regions and get blended
input on an image."
Ipeirotis says he is unfamiliar with Facebook's content
moderation policy, but maintains that the content moderation systems of different
companies are only as efficient as the standards they implement.
Haider says that while she understands that mistakes are
made, it's important that Facebook take incidents like this seriously because
arbitrary acts of censorship aren't compatible with the site's role as a forum
for free speech.
"It's only normal that Facebook, which has penetrated the
whole globe, hires employees from all over the world with various religious and
cultural backgrounds," she says. "This becomes problematic only when those
employees favor their cultural and religious biases over Facebook's policy of
respecting freedom of expression. This is why Facebook should take serious
measures regarding such mistakes. We trusted that Facebook would be a supporter
of freedom of expression and the uprising; we have faced the opposite by
feeling that Facebook is assisting extremists and misogynists to put us in a
corner.... It is disappointing, to say the least."
Facebook outlines some of its guidelines for acceptable
content on its community standards page while maintaining that it attempts to
balance the need for a safe online environment with its commitment to freedom
gives people around the world the power to publish their own stories, see the
world through the eyes of many other people, and connect and share wherever
they go," the page reads. "The conversation that happens on Facebook -- and the
opinions expressed here -- mirror the diversity of the people using Facebook.
To balance the needs and interests of a global population, Facebook protects
expression that meets the community standards."
the removal of Bakdounes' photograph, The Uprising of Women in the Arab World's
Facebook page has over 66,000 likes, and Haider acknowledges the important role
that social media sites such as Facebook have played in mobilizing activist
groups such as hers.
"We wanted a forum that can provide a free space for women
and men from around the Arab world to meet and voice their concerns and
propositions for a better reality for women within the transforming Arab
societies," she says. "In this sense, Facebook helps break the borders and
helps in sharing real experiences and awareness with the least possible costs."