During an interview with FP CEO David Rothkopf today, National Security Advisor Tom Donilon reflected on America's relationship with post-revolutionary Egypt, which, in recent weeks, has earned U.S. approval for its role in resolving the Israel-Hamas conflict and provoked U.S. concern over President Mohamed Morsy's controversial expansion of his powers. Donilon said he thought bilateral relations have "gone pretty well" so far but admitted that managing the partnership has been "a challenge" for both countries:
You couldn't have contemplated two-and-a-half years ago that the
United States would [have] as its principal interlocutor in Egypt,
running the government, a Muslim Brotherhood president. It's a
fundamental change. And it is a challenge to our diplomacy to broaden
out our relationship in the society and to forge a relationship with
this new government. And it's a challenge for them too. New to
government. How do they keep their economy together? Keep their polity
together? And to date I think it's gone pretty well. President Obama and
President Morsy have a pretty good relationship.
Donilon noted that the United States expects Egypt to uphold its peace treaty with Israel and cooperate on counterterrorism, adding that the biggest obstacle facing Egypt is economics, not politics:
The big challenge for them ... is
really economics. Egypt in the Arab world right now is really the main
game. There are substantial economic challenges coming out of the
revolution. They are working through their work with the IMF, which is
going to be very important. And that's going to require Egypt though to
have a face to the world, if you will, that is welcoming to outside
investors and economic relationships.
"It's an entirely different way of diplomacy when it comes to Egypt right now than we had for three decades," he observed.
On America's fraught relations with Pakistan, Donilon argued that, at the moment, "we don't have a crisis between
the United States and Pakistan - some individual crisis that we're having to
deal with." That means there can be a "broader, more strategic discussion"
about the partnership, he maintained:
At the end of the day is there really a
strategic divergence between the interests of Pakistan and the United States?
What [are] the points of friction? How can Pakistan support, for
example, reconciliation efforts in Afghanistan and do so in a sincere way? How
can Pakistan do more to deal with the safe haven issue which we have across the
border? And these discussions are ongoing now, and I think we're at a period
here where we don't have a front-and-center crisis, if you will, that's taking
all the political oxygen."
Back in October, during the third presidential debate, moderator Bob Schieffer asked whether it was "time for us to divorce Pakistan." It seems the Obama administration's answer is no.
David Y. Lee for FP